• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
LeGrande Law

LeGrande Law

Locked Up? Call LeGrande Law!

  • Houston Criminal Lawyer – About
  • Blog
  • Practice Areas
    • Drug Crimes
      • Marijuana / THC Possession
      • Controlled Substances
    • Weapon Crimes
      • Unlawful Carrying of a Weapon
      • Theft of Firearm
      • Possession of Firearm by Felon
    • Driving While Intoxicated (DWI)
    • Assault Crimes
      • Aggravated Assault
      • Family Violence
    • Evading Arrest
    • Racing on a highway
    • Parole & Probation Violations
    • Burglary
      • Burglary of Habitation
      • Burglary of Building
      • Burglary of Vehicles
    • Theft Crimes
      • Theft of Firearm
    • White Collar Crimes
      • Fraud
      • Money Laundering
      • Fraudulent Use of Identifying Information
      • Texas Money Services Act
      • Embezzlement
      • Forgery
    • Juvenile Law
    • Expunction & Nondisclosure
    • Asset Forfeiture
  • Defenses
    • Illegal Search and Seizure
    • Affirmative Links
    • Self Defense
    • Defense of Property
  • Legal Guides
  • Contact Us

Locked Up?
Call LeGrande Law!

(281) 684-3500
General Blawgins' Supreme Court tighte ...
1

Supreme Court tightens law on “Straw Purchasers” of firearms

June 17, 2014

If you have purchased a firearm you may have seen the signs: “Don’t lie for the other guy” warning those purchasing firearms for someone else buying a firearm for someone that is not allowed to own one (Eg., Convicted Felons) you can end up in jail.  However, the supreme court attenuated the law a little in the case of Abramski v. United States.  What seems odd from this opinion is that The majority holds that even if both the “straw” purchaser and the intended recipient are eligible to purchase and possess a firearm, it still can be an illegal straw transaction.

In my opinion this decision ignores the purpose of the legislation – to prevent criminals from acquiring guns.  However, the court disagreed, cash-for-gunsseeming to say that the real purpose was to be able to account for who are the actual purchasers and holders of specific firearms.

In a 5-4 opinion, the court held that the law applied to a Virginia man who bought a gun with the intention of transferring it to his uncle in Pennsylvania — even though the uncle is not prohibited from owning firearms.

The debate centers around federal gun laws intended to prevent sham buyers from obtaining guns for the sole purpose of giving them to someone else. The laws were part of Congress’ effort to make sure firearms did not get into the hands of unlawful recipients.

Defendant Abramski bought a Glock 19 handgun in Virginia in 2009 and later transferred it to his uncle in Pennsylvania. Abramski, a former police officer, assured the Virginia dealer he was the “actual buyer” of the weapon even though he had already offered to buy the gun for his uncle using his expired police identification to get a discount.

During the transaction, Abramski answered “yes” on a federal form asking “Are you the actual transferee buyer of the firearm(s) listed on this form? Warning: You are not the actual buyer if you are acquiring the firearm(s) on behalf of another person. If you are not the actual buyer, the dealer cannot transfer the firearm(s) to you.”

Abramski purchased the gun three days after his uncle had written him a check for $400 with “Glock 19 handgun” written in the memo line.

Justice Kagan spoke for the majority, espousing that the federal government’s elaborate system of background checks and record-keeping requirements help law enforcement investigate crimes by tracing guns to their buyers. “Those provisions would mean little if a would-be gun buyer could evade them by simply getting another person to buy the gun and fill out the paperwork.”

In dissent, Justice Scalia said the language of the law does not support making it a crime for one lawful gun owner to buy a gun for another. Expectedly, Scalia was joined by the court’s other conservatives — Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

Abramski is being too honest where he doesn’t need to be, and too dishonest where it is most important to be honest!  How could this problem have been avoided?  He should have said he was buying the gun for another person that could have lawfully owned it…wait…would they have allowed that transaction to occur?

Related

Categories
  • General Blawgins'
Tags
  • Abramski,
  • gun,
  • purchaser,
  • scalia,
  • straw,
  • supreme court

Filed Under: General Blawgins' Tagged With: Abramski, gun, purchaser, scalia, straw, supreme court

General Blawgins' Supreme Court tighte ...

Call top rated Houston criminal defense lawyer Tristan LeGrande directly if you need legal consultation or advice.

(281) 684-3500

or

Contact Us

CONTACT LEGRANDE LAW


0 / 180

Footer

Contact

Address

712 Main Street, Suite 1840
Houston, TX 77002 USA

Telephone

281-684-3500

Fax

713-575-9694

Español

281-236-2326

Navigation

  • Houston Criminal Lawyer – About
  • Blog
  • Defenses
  • Practice Areas
  • Legal Guides | Q & A
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Other Links

  • Asset Forfeiture
  • Driving While Intoxicated (DWI)
  • Drug Crimes
  • Evading Arrest
  • Burglary
  • Theft Crimes
  • Weapon Crimes
  • White Collar Crimes

© 2025 LeGrande Law, All Rights Reserved.

Powered by [D]

Off Canvas: Main Mobile Nav

Navigation

  • Home
  • Houston Criminal Lawyer – About
  • Practice Areas
    • Assault Crimes
      • Aggravated Assault
    • Asset Forfeiture
    • Driving While Intoxicated (DWI)
    • Drug Crimes
      • Controlled Substances
      • Marijuana / THC Possession
    • Evading Arrest
    • Expunction & Nondisclosure
    • Family Violence
    • Juvenile Law
    • Parole & Probation Violations
    • Racing on a highway
    • Burglary
      • Burglary of Habitation
      • Burglary of Building
      • Burglary of Vehicles
    • Theft Crimes
      • Theft of Firearm
    • Weapon Crimes
      • Unlawful Carrying of a Weapon
      • Possession of Firearm by Felon
      • Theft of Firearm
    • White Collar Crimes
      • Embezzlement
      • Forgery
      • Fraud
      • Fraudulent Use of Identifying Information
      • Money Laundering
      • Texas Money Services Act
  • Defenses
    • Affirmative Links
    • Defense of Property
    • Illegal Search and Seizure
    • Self Defense
  • Legal Guides
  • Blog
  • Contact Us